skb2706:
To answer your question, the answer is no. By letting the slightly shorter chamber (by @0.002") determine headspace, you actually put less backward pressure on the case than you do with having a bullet jammed into the lands pushing back on the entire case/shoulder/neck area.
The idea of jamming the bullet into the lands to fire form an Ackley round came about when some folks went the cheap route to an Ackley chamber and just ran an AI reamer into an existing standard chamber to get the 40 degree shoulder. What they actually got in that case was a chamber that was slightly too long, and the only way to attempt to set proper headspace on the case was to jam a bullet into the lands to force the face of the cartridge back against the bolt face.
That's why setting a barrel back at least one thread is the only correct way to go from a standard case to an AI case; ie 257 Robt. to 257 Robt. AI.
Again, if the AI chamber is set up correctly, jamming a bullet int the lands is not only not needed, but it might also create some unnecessary case stretching upon firing.
Like was mentioned above, reading the 2 Volume Ackley Handbooks is a good primer on the subject. PO Ackley never saw improving a cartridge for extra velocity as a reason to do it. He was interested in lessening rear bolt thrust at firing (straight case walls) as well as attempting to direct unburned powder into the center of the barrel (40 degree shoulder) and away from the throat area of the barrel as reasons why he developed the concept. Increased velocity was just a natural result of increased case capacity
HTH -BCB