Originally Posted By: RiflemannMy S&W Shield40 is about the same size as the glock42, but it is a 40cal instead of a 380.
Actually the same could be said for the Glock 27. It is
about the same size as your Shield(6+1), and it holds 9+1
rounds of 40 S&W, with flush mags.
Actual specs for the three pistols:
Glock 42(380 Auto):
Length - 5.94", Height - 4.13", Width - .836", Weight - 13.4 oz empty, Capacity with flush mag - 6+1
M&P Shield(40 S&W):
Length - 6.1", Height - 4.6", Width - .95", Weight - 19.0 oz empty, Capacity with flush mag - 6+1
Glock 27(40 S&W):
Length - 6.29", Height - 4.17", Width - 1.18", Weight - 19.75 oz empty, Capacity with flush mag - 9+1
So if you really want to compare apples to apples, compare
to the Glock 27, and IMHO it spanks the M&P Shield...Higher
capacity, shorter height for better concealment, and bit
longer barrel.
The Glock 42 will be easier to hide, than the Shield or the
Glock 27. And if your want to again compare apples to apples,
the M&P Bodyguard 380 should be the comparison point.
M&P Bodyguard 380:
Length - 5.25", Height(measured on mine) - 4.19", Width(measured on mine) - .875", Weight - 12 oz, capacity
6+1
For me, the Glock 42 came in second to the M&P Bodyguard 380.
The M&P is shorter, about the same height, is lighter, and
has the same capacity. The real secret that makes the M&P
lights out better is the true double action hidden hammer
versus the striker fired Glock. If one pulls the trigger
on a round that doesn't go bang, the hammer fired M&P allows
for repeated primer strikes. The striker fired Glock has to
shuck the bad round. The M&P also comes with an integrated
laser. I really don't have much use for it, but it helps
in training, when I introduce people to pocket pistols, and
they struggle getting rounds on target. The laser movement
shows them their technique failures.
Squeeze