Originally Posted By: Dooger
$25/lb of powder
$120/1000 bullets
$35/1000 primers
Actually, the powder I use(Hodgdon Universal) was less
than $18/lb, in a 8 lb jug, at my local Rod&Gun club.
And the Berry's plated 100 gr. RNHB bullets I load in
the 380, are $80/1000 with shipping. Primers were
$33.30/1000 with sales tax at a local supplier, when I
purchased Sunday. My point is shop around, and one
can trim a few pennies out of each round. And even
9mmx19 ammo can be loaded for a substantial savings,
when one can even find it.
Back to the original topic, of the G42, I am seeing a number
of comments on how the G42 should have been a 9mm, or
why a not so pocket sized 380 from Glock. Ruger did the
same thing with their LC-9 morphed into the LC-380, and
I didn't hear the wailing and gnashing of teeth.
I think it a good size for folks that want a soft shooting
small pistol for personal defense. Ruger was on to something,
and Glock saw a way to kill two birds with one stone. The
G26 sized 380, not sold in the USA, except to LEOs, has always
been in demand, and people have been calling for a single
stack thin Glock. So enter the Glock 42. Yes Glock could
have gone the way of Ruger, and introduce the 9mmx19 single
stack, and then the 380 single stack, but their market
analysis must have shown a different strategy. I think this
plan will work well for them.
Squeeze