dan newberry
New member
Lots of guys have a knife fetish--and I've got no problem with that. A very nice custom made piece is an heirloom, and a joy to own I'm sure...
I've done a lot of reading about the various steels that are out there... their presumed advantages, etc.
I've actually bought some of the higher end knives, paying over 100 bucks in some cases--for knives that are supposed to have "the" steel in them. They're supposed to hold an edge better than anything out there, never rust, etc.
But when I go to work up deer each season, I have seen some of the presumed "better" knives coming in second to my Buck 112 and my Buck 110--as far as practical use goes.
I know that even Buck doesn't consider the steel in these knives their best--but I can't fault it. These knives hold an edge better than anything else I've used, and they'll take an edge (if you know how to sharpen them) quite easily.
When I was a kid... around 12 or 13 I think, I actually took a hammer and I drove the blade of my Buck 110 through a 3/8" bolt--just to see if their logo was false advertising or not. It worked. Yes, it made a ding in the honed area of the edge, but it sharpened right back out... the knife cut the bolt in two. My dad said I was an idiot. He was probably right. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif
So what is it about, say the steel in the Spyderco that cost me nearly 100 dollars? VG-10 or something like that it's called. Or that AS 34 or whatever. I haven't seen the advantages at all. These other steels can't touch the standard Buck steel, in my opinion. Sorry. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif
I think a lot of knives are made to fondle rather than use. You can usually spot the type when they're presented in a photograph... reposed against an antler, or pressed into some hand tooled sheath that cost more than a good knife itself ought to. I know that some guys actually do use these type knives, but I will likely remain skeptical that they're any more useful than a decent Buck. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gif
Dan
I've done a lot of reading about the various steels that are out there... their presumed advantages, etc.
I've actually bought some of the higher end knives, paying over 100 bucks in some cases--for knives that are supposed to have "the" steel in them. They're supposed to hold an edge better than anything out there, never rust, etc.
But when I go to work up deer each season, I have seen some of the presumed "better" knives coming in second to my Buck 112 and my Buck 110--as far as practical use goes.
I know that even Buck doesn't consider the steel in these knives their best--but I can't fault it. These knives hold an edge better than anything else I've used, and they'll take an edge (if you know how to sharpen them) quite easily.
When I was a kid... around 12 or 13 I think, I actually took a hammer and I drove the blade of my Buck 110 through a 3/8" bolt--just to see if their logo was false advertising or not. It worked. Yes, it made a ding in the honed area of the edge, but it sharpened right back out... the knife cut the bolt in two. My dad said I was an idiot. He was probably right. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif
So what is it about, say the steel in the Spyderco that cost me nearly 100 dollars? VG-10 or something like that it's called. Or that AS 34 or whatever. I haven't seen the advantages at all. These other steels can't touch the standard Buck steel, in my opinion. Sorry. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif
I think a lot of knives are made to fondle rather than use. You can usually spot the type when they're presented in a photograph... reposed against an antler, or pressed into some hand tooled sheath that cost more than a good knife itself ought to. I know that some guys actually do use these type knives, but I will likely remain skeptical that they're any more useful than a decent Buck. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gif
Dan