Quote:
I use nat gear or MO Brush if I'm not using a ghillie.
I've had a question about the PX article that I haven't seen brought up. They went on at length about how certain colors show up as different colors to a coyotes eye. My question is this: If your camo blends in with what's behind it, what difference does the color make? If a coyote sees hot pink as white and lime green as brown won't hot pink and lime green camo blend in and break up an outline in front of a hot pink and lime green background? Or does the exact shade make that big of a difference? I might have missed it in the article but to me it seemed like they were more hung up on what color turns to what than the basics of camo. I'm not asking this as a PX basher I'm just curious if anyone else thought the same.
Nate
I wish PX would have used RealTree APHD, instead of the Advantage Timber in that PX comparison. The APHD is much lighter than the Adv. Timber, and apparently has a bit more contrast.
PX took three dark camo's, and compared them to M2D while sitting in the sunlight in a grassy environment. Seemed like a bit of a stacked deck in M2D's favor to me. I would have liked to see some of the comparisons take place in some fresh clearcuts, and deep timber (the stuff I hunt in for the most part) while set-up in the shade.
Camo for predators does appear to be more about shades, then colors (yes I know that being motionless is the most important thing). I noticed that when using the greyscale filter feature on Photobucket, on some hunting photos of my camo clothes, and gun. I had only realized that two of the colors I originally used on my gun's camo were the exact same shade, when I used the greyscale feature on photobucket.