Iranian Uprising

1774019614456.png
 
well read this morning the deadline was extended. Kind of surprised, but not actually.
Wasn't looking forward to the type of strike threatened. Yet in the same breath not exactly what I am of the opinion he should do. Which is follow through.
Of course being shielded from the briefings and intel that he gets. I can say such things and be wrong. Then again, the tactic may very well be in his wheel house. He didn't take the threat off the table, just shifted it to the right. Now to just sit back and watch them shoot craps.
 
Jokes and all aside, Trump's problem is getting Iran to quit without hurting the Iranian peoples. Jihadists don't care. Then the Chinese missiles/radar that didn't work will get redone - war testing without being directly involved. Jihadists also get to 'perfect' their stuff til it works better. As long as they don't hit civilian pop's in neighbor countries, Arabs won't join the fight. India and China want Hormuz open for oil, we want it open so the US cost of oil (futures) goes down.
 
well read this morning the deadline was extended. Kind of surprised, but not actually.
Wasn't looking forward to the type of strike threatened. Yet in the same breath not exactly what I am of the opinion he should do. Which is follow through.
Of course being shielded from the briefings and intel that he gets. I can say such things and be wrong. Then again, the tactic may very well be in his wheel house. He didn't take the threat off the table, just shifted it to the right. Now to just sit back and watch them shoot craps.
I do not believe anything they are saying. Trump is desperate and cannot find a way out. This is different than Iraq and Afghanistan. Turn off Fox News; there is no victory in sight.
 
I do not believe anything they are saying. Trump is desperate and cannot find a way out. This is different than Iraq and Afghanistan. Turn off Fox News; there is no victory in sight.
OK Jeremy got your point of view, but I didn't get that from Fox ..... And you maybe right on all accounts. But I still say if you threaten and deadline, better be able to back it up. Now I don't know why he didn't follow through.
But I can promise you Had I made that threat come Monday the whole country would have been out of power at the same time. Not that I would actually make the threat but if I uttered it... yeah follow through would have been required.
Which I'm sure we both agree on that whole point.
 
OK Jeremy got your point of view, but I didn't get that from Fox ..... And you maybe right on all accounts. But I still say if you threaten and deadline, better be able to back it up. Now I don't know why he didn't follow through.
But I can promise you Had I made that threat come Monday the whole country would have been out of power at the same time. Not that I would actually make the threat but if I uttered it... yeah follow through would have been required.
Which I'm sure we both agree on that whole point.

That came out wrong earlier—I wasn’t trying to imply you get your info from Fox, just laying out the stakes.

I get the point about backing up a threat—I agree credibility matters. But the real question isn’t “can you follow through?”—it’s what that follow-through actually unleashes. What are 5,000 Marines and paratroopers going to do on their own, other than open the door for even more troops?

Striking Iran’s power grid isn’t just a tactical move—it unleashes full-scale infrastructure warfare. Apocalyptic scenes most likely unfolding across neighboring countries, hitting entire populations. Once it starts, nobody fully controls it.

Even if we declared victory and pulled out now, the war doesn’t end. It morphs into a long, grinding spiral of continued Iranian attacks, economic collapse, and humanitarian disaster—dragging on while the rest of the world struggles to contain it.

Fox News might say that if we beat them bad enough eventually they’ll say uncle—not gonna happen. At this point, I see us heading down the road to a slow-motion apocalypse.
 
Back
Top