Sgt_Mike
Well-known member
After my recent workings on the Winchester 121, the bug bit me on the 22LR cartridge.
Meaning having two on hand, the existing Winchester 121 will be ear marked for my Granddaughter. (so here in the next few years it will leave and go to my son's stable for her)
This explains why I asked about the SB Remington 510 I was considering for a project gun in a post. The outcome was it is that it is a "collectable" hence passed on it, so I found a Savage Mark one on Gun broker, not a collectable, perfect I thought, quite a bit of external rust and peep sights. Ok I thought would be a good choice, most will pass this by. The bidding was staying under $20.00 with a $40.00 shipping. Here I will sound like a "lowballer", "cheapskate", or whatever one wishes to assign to my desire to keep the cost down.
So this rifle hits $78.00 dollar range on the bid a few hours before ending, so I applied math, 78.00 + 40.00 (shipping) + 11.80 (taxes) + 25.00 (transfer from Local FFL) + 125.00 (cutting to 16" range, and threading barrel) + 100.00 (D&T for scope base) + 40.00 ( EGW scope base) totals $419.80, less / minus gather materials to redo the stock, parkerize the barreled action, and screws, etc.
At this point I got off the computer went to a FFL, whom I worked as a manager for after I retired from the military. I knew what the normal mark up was so that wasn't a issue. we sat down and went over the math (taxes etc) $303.00 out the door after sales taxes. I sealed the deal, prepaid for the Savage Mark II FV-SR, now waiting on the arrival of the new short range gopher killer / informal paper hole puncher from the warehouse (usually in Louisiana so it will be rather soon I suspect).
The Savage Mark II FV-SR is familiar to many, and is not special, so for those that aren't familiar with the exact model goes in the exact direction I was wanting to do the project in.
5.5 lbs as shipped
16.5" Varmint / bull threaded barrel
13.9" LOP
35 1/4" overall Length
a 0 MOA scope base from the factory
Accutrigger
Synthetic stock (I never have liked a majority of this stocks from the factory, so a wait and see on how it performs, I know it will be "flimsy" in the forearm). and the comb will be low as the design is setup for sights vs a scope. Even the wood stocks they offer has the same flaw for the comb)
It is known as a solid performer for it's price point (MSRP) in the accuracy performance.
I'm figuring the rifle "should" be at the dealer about this friday (the 29th) or maybe monday (the 31st) for me to pick up after the paperwork.
Once I do the transfer, next is looking for a set of correct height of rings for the Leupold Freedom 6.5-18 x40 Tri-MOA (30mm tube, more adjustment than the one on the win 121, this one is my spare optic). Which I'll get the objective as low as I can to the barrel. That factory base is kind of high so I'm thinking low's will work satisfactorily for the height. I'll know for sure when I go to mount the optic. (of course the end result. I'll be in the market for a spare Leupold scope preferably a EFR version vs the side focus over the next 6 months or so).
Meaning having two on hand, the existing Winchester 121 will be ear marked for my Granddaughter. (so here in the next few years it will leave and go to my son's stable for her)
This explains why I asked about the SB Remington 510 I was considering for a project gun in a post. The outcome was it is that it is a "collectable" hence passed on it, so I found a Savage Mark one on Gun broker, not a collectable, perfect I thought, quite a bit of external rust and peep sights. Ok I thought would be a good choice, most will pass this by. The bidding was staying under $20.00 with a $40.00 shipping. Here I will sound like a "lowballer", "cheapskate", or whatever one wishes to assign to my desire to keep the cost down.
So this rifle hits $78.00 dollar range on the bid a few hours before ending, so I applied math, 78.00 + 40.00 (shipping) + 11.80 (taxes) + 25.00 (transfer from Local FFL) + 125.00 (cutting to 16" range, and threading barrel) + 100.00 (D&T for scope base) + 40.00 ( EGW scope base) totals $419.80, less / minus gather materials to redo the stock, parkerize the barreled action, and screws, etc.
At this point I got off the computer went to a FFL, whom I worked as a manager for after I retired from the military. I knew what the normal mark up was so that wasn't a issue. we sat down and went over the math (taxes etc) $303.00 out the door after sales taxes. I sealed the deal, prepaid for the Savage Mark II FV-SR, now waiting on the arrival of the new short range gopher killer / informal paper hole puncher from the warehouse (usually in Louisiana so it will be rather soon I suspect).
The Savage Mark II FV-SR is familiar to many, and is not special, so for those that aren't familiar with the exact model goes in the exact direction I was wanting to do the project in.
5.5 lbs as shipped
16.5" Varmint / bull threaded barrel
13.9" LOP
35 1/4" overall Length
a 0 MOA scope base from the factory
Accutrigger
Synthetic stock (I never have liked a majority of this stocks from the factory, so a wait and see on how it performs, I know it will be "flimsy" in the forearm). and the comb will be low as the design is setup for sights vs a scope. Even the wood stocks they offer has the same flaw for the comb)
It is known as a solid performer for it's price point (MSRP) in the accuracy performance.
I'm figuring the rifle "should" be at the dealer about this friday (the 29th) or maybe monday (the 31st) for me to pick up after the paperwork.
Once I do the transfer, next is looking for a set of correct height of rings for the Leupold Freedom 6.5-18 x40 Tri-MOA (30mm tube, more adjustment than the one on the win 121, this one is my spare optic). Which I'll get the objective as low as I can to the barrel. That factory base is kind of high so I'm thinking low's will work satisfactorily for the height. I'll know for sure when I go to mount the optic. (of course the end result. I'll be in the market for a spare Leupold scope preferably a EFR version vs the side focus over the next 6 months or so).
Last edited: