NM Leon
New member
Lordy I do love a spirited debate!
Q, I do have a smallish disagreement with you.
"As hunters we need to have a unified standard of ethics to be accepted as legitimate. My concern is that antis will start using the information that we callers don’t have an impact on coyote populations at all so there is no reason we should kill them at all? That’s a different way to look at it isn’t it? Maybe some day we can only kill coyotes if there is a truly legitimate problem and we may have to apply for permits to take care of these problems. Maybe only licensed professionals will be allowed to take care of these problems? We don’t really know what the future holds for the coyote hunter or trapper but all I can say is that we need to keep our noses clean and show an up most respect for all of the animals we hunt and harvest. If we don’t it will hurt us in the long run."
The antis I've run across don't really give two figs for when I hunt, what I hunt, how I hunt it, etc. They are against KILLING especially for sport and usually anti gun too. While they generally ignore the obvious, I'm sure they would be much happier if their steaks and leather belts were grown in a vat.
The only place I've ever seen or heard any debate about the ethics of how/where/when/what or why it's OK or not OK to hunt is among hunters.
IMHO about the best we can do versus the antis is to keep a low profile wherever they are herding-up and be law abiding (and if possible teach their kids to hunt, LOL).
I cringe whenever I see a game animal tied on someones back bumper driving down a city street or read a newspaper story about poaching.
Another interesting resource for coyote info with lots of referenced papers is:
http://www.canids.org/PUBLICAT/CNDNEWS3/coyotes.htm
Edit: One large disagreement with Q, everyone with sense knows that the best rock and roll band is a tie between Pink Floyd and Jethro Tull. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif
Q, I do have a smallish disagreement with you.
"As hunters we need to have a unified standard of ethics to be accepted as legitimate. My concern is that antis will start using the information that we callers don’t have an impact on coyote populations at all so there is no reason we should kill them at all? That’s a different way to look at it isn’t it? Maybe some day we can only kill coyotes if there is a truly legitimate problem and we may have to apply for permits to take care of these problems. Maybe only licensed professionals will be allowed to take care of these problems? We don’t really know what the future holds for the coyote hunter or trapper but all I can say is that we need to keep our noses clean and show an up most respect for all of the animals we hunt and harvest. If we don’t it will hurt us in the long run."
The antis I've run across don't really give two figs for when I hunt, what I hunt, how I hunt it, etc. They are against KILLING especially for sport and usually anti gun too. While they generally ignore the obvious, I'm sure they would be much happier if their steaks and leather belts were grown in a vat.
The only place I've ever seen or heard any debate about the ethics of how/where/when/what or why it's OK or not OK to hunt is among hunters.
IMHO about the best we can do versus the antis is to keep a low profile wherever they are herding-up and be law abiding (and if possible teach their kids to hunt, LOL).
I cringe whenever I see a game animal tied on someones back bumper driving down a city street or read a newspaper story about poaching.
Another interesting resource for coyote info with lots of referenced papers is:
http://www.canids.org/PUBLICAT/CNDNEWS3/coyotes.htm
Edit: One large disagreement with Q, everyone with sense knows that the best rock and roll band is a tie between Pink Floyd and Jethro Tull. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif
Last edited by a moderator: