USA,
The “mini” Compares very favorably to the classic calls like the 416. The 416 is louder in some instances and in others the mini” is louder especially in the low and high frequencies. The “mini” is about ½ the size of the 416.
GJJ,
The release date has not been nailed down yet as we have the parts on the way. We want to do more extensive field studies. A rough guess will be mid October… it could be earlier or it could be later.
At moderate volume levels the sound will be similar when the sound is played through the cone speakers. The FX5 will be better able to produce the really low frequencies because it has a 92mm speaker and the “mini” uses a 77mm speaker.
The FX5 will have the edge on volume when you use its internal horn speaker at the mid-range frequencies.
Some may prefer the FX5 because they can operate it without using the transmitter, and it has 2 speakers.
GeorgiaJoe,
I don't think we will offer an on/off upgrade... This would be a very complex modification and would be cost prohibitive. We may add that feature at a later date on new FX5s when we roll out the next revision board. The transmitter code would have to change as well.
ADCoyote,
I can't tell you what should be important to you. If you think the loudest volume that can be obtained is important for your hunting environment then that’s fine. Our Custom Shop can easily build you a call for this task!
I don't believe in most calling situations extreme volume is the most critical aspect of the set. We have on film a coyote coming in up-wind hard from over a mile away in 25-30mph winds. The caller was the FX5 using the horn speaker at 1/2 volume, the sound was Lightning Jack. This hunt will be on our video when we release it.
I know that there are many people that prefer as much volume as you will give them. That is what works for them, and what they feel comfortable with. I simply won't argue that at all. I know what I like, and you know what you like. We will provide a unit for everyone's wants and needs.
As far as the “mini” looking like the M1, you’re right; the transmitter housings are identical as they chose the same case and antenna that we used.
We chose an off-the-shelf housing four our “mini” that is different from the M1.
The idea for the “mini” stems from the release of the FX3. After the release, many people loved their new FX3 and would not give it up, but they did however miss being able to put it in their pockets as they could the 416. We are simply answering the call to make a small pocket caller.
Pocket callers are nothing new. One of the original FOXPRO shirt-pocket prototypes was actually built in the same housing that the TX-5LR and TX-200 use. This was caller was built in 1996. Here is a photo of it:
I can tell you the “mini” is far more advanced then ANY caller in its size and price point. Here is a list of features that it has OVER the competition:
Transmitter:
1: Graphic LCD Display "no paper sound list"
2: 4 Presets "with sound numbers AND volume"
3: Elapsed Timer (with Reset)
4: Volume Number Indicator
5: TX Battery level Indicator
6: Channel Indicator
7: Current Sound Playing Indicator
8: Auto Power Off
9: Inverted Graphics for "night use"
10: Channel selection (without taking the TX apart)
11: Turn main unit on/off
Main Unit
1: Battery Management (monitors battery temperature)
2: Plays WAV'S, MP3’s and FXP's
3: USB port
4: When dead battery detected it disconnects the battery to protect from deep discharge.
5: 15% Larger Speaker 66mm vs. 77mm
6: Mylar Cone Speaker
7: Physically smaller
8: PCB protection
And remember, it's the feature sets and internal components of units that make the difference.
doggin coyotes,
If you look at the picture with the transmitter on top you can see the antenna just above the hinge. The antenna tucks nicely along the hinge for protection.