Easy for a person to draw a conclusion or an opinion of or NOT. From missing information. I've done that myself. With limited information.
Drawing a conclusion or an opinion, w/o TOTAL facts. May be true, may be not. Other experiences, can assist us in drawing a conclusion from another scenario we've witnessed. When facts are still missing. As to what we've seen or really understand. But still, it is flawed.
As it is sometimes NOT possible to gain ALL information & or facts. To obtain a total understanding of the TRUTH. Of what were really seeing in the field. People do the best they can, with the information gathered.
Some yrs back, I killed a female coyote from a pr. This was on a 2x2 mile section. One of the farmer's[of which there were two of them]. That raised sheep on this 2x2 land mass. They both had sheep killing going on.
Well, after I killed the female. The sheep killing quit. The male had left the area about 2 wks? later. NO coyotes treveled into or across this section the rest of the Winter. When in fact, there were other neighboring coyotes in adjacent sections. This 2x2 mile section BTW, was prime habitat. With plenty of other prey & cover. I "concluded", with the information I had seen. That I indeed killed the female sheep killer.
The following yr, sheep killing started up on the next section adjacent to the 2x2 mile. I "suspected" that male moved nearby & mated with a female. Thus started killing sheep in that section. No doubt some FACTS, were missing in my assumption. My above assumption was biased, still is. Same as my lower scenario. As I wasn't able to obtain ALL FACTS.
What we see in the field & then draw a conclusion to, CAN be biased or skewed. Due to the fact. WE do not have ALL of the FACTS.